Related Releases & Reports:
|
|
Air Pollution
& Human Health
Taking Our Breath Away
Power Plant Pollutant :
Smog-Forming Nitrogen Oxide
Health Effects: Lung
Disease, Asthma Attacks
The American Lung
Association
estimates that more than 135 million Americans live in
areas where the air quality poses health threats due to smog. In
1999, a scientific study found that smog triggered more than six million
asthma attacks in a single year.
Causing Death And Sickness
Power Plant Pollutant :
Sulfur Dioxide Or Soot
Health Effects: Heart
Attacks, Premature Death
Health studies show that fine particle pollution
or “soot” is taking years off our lives. A 2000 study by the EPA’s health
impact research firm, estimated that soot from power plants alone
is responsible for shortening the lives of 30,000 Americans annually.
Poisoning The Fish We Eat
Power Plant Pollutant :
Mercury
Health Effects: Neurological
Damage, Birth Defects
Health officials in 40 states have issued warnings
not to eat too much fish, due to mercury contamination. The National
Academy of Sciences estimates that 60,000 U.S. children are born
each year with a risk of nervous system damage from mercury exposure
in the womb.
See Mercury, Fish & Your Health
Changing Our Climate
Power Plant Pollutant :
Greenhouse Gas Carbon Dioxide
Environmental Effects :
Drought, Floods, Infectious Disease And Loss
Of Coastline.
Hundreds of the world’s climate scientists have
warned that carbon dioxide emissions are causing an increase in
global temperatures. Our ability to prevent devastating climate change
events is diminishing as time passes and our carbon emissions only
increase.
|
|
Air pollution in the U.S. is still bad enough to
trigger millions of asthma attacks and send hundreds of thousands of kids
and senior citizens to hospital emergency rooms each year.
Yet, instead of taking tough action against air
pollution, President Bush has responded with an industry-friendly
plan that actually allows more pollution into our skies.
We need a different plan, one that protects our
health now and for the future.
Action Alert:
Tell Senator Baucus You're Disappointed with His Vote Against Cleaner
Air
The Clean Power Act (S.556) passed the
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Thursday, June 27th with
a vote of 10-9, despite Montana Max Senator Baucus. The senior member of
the committee who has voted in the public interest on past clean air issues
instead chose to side with industry on this important bill.
The bill calls to dramatically reduce four main power plant pollutants;
mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and carbon dioxide. Scientific
evidence shows that these pollutants have severe impacts on public health,
and particularly aggravate respiratory problems. This same pollution contributes
to some of our worst environmental problems, such as ozone damage to trees
and crops, mercury contamination of fish and streams, and global climate
change. Read MontPIRG's
press release for more information.
Call or E-mail Senator Max Baucus TODAY and let him know you
disappointed in his opposition to Clean Air in Montana.
1-800-332-6106 or
max@baucus.senate.gov
Millions Of Americans Already Breathe Air Deemed Hazardous
By The EPA
Air pollution is causing a public health crisis
in the U.S. Each year, smog and soot cause millions of asthma
attacks and even the premature death of tens of thousands of Americans.
Children, senior citizens and people with asthma are most at risk.
Electric power plants emit more of the pollution
that causes smog and soot formation than any other industry. Moreover,
these same plants are the largest source of the pollutants that
cause mercury contamination in our food chain, acid rain, haze in
our national parks and global warming.
The Bush Air Pollution Plan Threatens Our Health
We need more, not less, protection against dangerous
air pollution. But, President Bush’s air pollution plan would
dismantle key clean air safeguards, allowing far more pollution into
our skies.
Under the direction of Vice President Cheney,
and to the delight of lobbyists from the big energy companies
, President Bush’s plan would allow power plants, refineries and
other facilities to emit hundreds of thousands of tons of additional
pollution each year. The president’s plan would also replace clean
air programs with much weaker air pollution caps, undoing decades
of progress toward cleaner air. These changes to current standards would
weaken an integral program known as “New Source Review” (NSR), by opening
as many as nine new loopholes. This program is designed to ensure that
old power plants and other industrial facilities eventually install
modern pollution controls, which are required at new facilities.
Under President Bush’s plan, old, dirty plants
would be allowed to emit 10 times more pollution per year compared
to new facilities, and may never be required to clean up.
Gutting the NSR program would have dire health
consequences for thousands of Americans. For example, between
5,500 and 9,000 premature deaths could be avoided each year by
cleaning up just 51 dirty power plants that are currently being sued
for violations of the NSR program.
Administration Proposes Weaker Emissions Standards
President Bush’s air pollution plan would also
weaken emissions standards set by the Clean Air Act to make our
air cleaner by 2012. Not only would these changes permit more pollution,
but they wouldn’t take full effect until 2018. This would mean six
more years of breathing unhealthy air from power plants that should
have cleaned up their acts long ago.
Public Concern Abounds: A Shortsighted Plan Scrutinized
Who favors the Bush plan on air pollution? Many
of the same energy companies that contributed at least $2.4 million
to the president’s election campaign. Who’s against it? So far,
a broad range of environmental leaders, public health advocates,
state and local government officials, and media outlets have spoken
out against the plan. Among them:
"Bush’s plan would allow 36 percent to 100 percent
more
—The Newark
Star-Ledger
, Monday, February 18, 2002
"Bush’s Clean Skies standards wouldn’t even start
phasing in until 2008, and in the meantime his plan would weaken
the Clean Air Act to allow massive new increases in air pollution—a
36% increase in smog-producing pollutants, a 50% increase in the
pollution that causes acid rain and a 73% increase in toxic mercury
emissions."
—Los Angeles
Times
, February 15, 2002
"It’s a very dangerous camouflage for a retreat on
clean air . . . "
—Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal
in the Hartford Courant, February 15, 2002
"In effect, this has become a polluter protection
plan. . . It’s a Valentine’s Day Massacre of the Clean Air Act."
—Frank O’Donnell,
Clean Air Trust
Powerful special interests may support
the Bush air pollution plan, but as the Enron scandal has shown,
an informed and engaged public can motivate leaders to act. We need
your help to stop the clean air rollbacks. Visit our
Clean Air Now!
site to take action.
Also see recent commentary from our director about this
issue: The
Clean Air Act Under Attack
.
|